1. Gomphotherium
This elephant ancestor lived during the Miocene and Pliocene. It is considered to be a member of the gomphotheres, a group of proboscids directly ancestral to mammoths and modern day elephants. It stood about 3m tall, and had 4 tusks, two upper incisors and 2 lower incisors. Conjecture has it that Gomphotherium used the bottom tusks to dig up aquatic vegetation.
2. Platybelodon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2767/b2767579775de1efb003454e05c2af98338abf1e" alt=""
This is another gomphothere. The upper two tusks were reasonably small compared to the size of the animal, and were probably used for defensive purposes. The bottom 2 tusks were fused, forming a kind of shovel, which helped the animal dig up more solid vegetation than aquatic plants. It also let the animal scrape bark off trees, as modern-day elephants do. Platybelodon lived during the Miocene.
3. African elephants
The African elephants are members of the genus Loxodonta, and there are thought to be 2 extant species, the African bush elephant (familiar to everyone) and the African forest elephant, a smaller species that inhabits the African jungles, has more toenails, and shorter tusks. There are probably around 10,000 elephants of both species left in the wild.
4. Mastodons
5. Mammoths
6. Asian elephants
Asian elephants belong to a genus all their own, Elephas. They split from the African elephant lineage about 5 million years ago in North Africa, and then migrated across to East Asia and the sub-continent. There are several extant subspecies, the most famous one living in India and Sri Lanka. There are also populations in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam. The Chinese one however, is extinct.
7. Palaeomastodon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e16a/3e16a7d6c14236d89f605d7a22c607c07fd9db6e" alt=""
Palaeomastodon was a member of an eponymous genus. It lived about 38 million years ago, and was fairly small at 1 to 2m. They had 2 short tusks in the upper jaws, and flat broad protruding teeth (not quite tusks) in the lower (also protruding) jaws to scoop swamp vegetation out of the water. It did have a trunk, although it was short and probably not as flexible as those of later proboscids.
8. Moeritherium
This is an extremely basal member of Proboscidea, so basal, in fact, that it doesn't have a trunk. It lived about 50m years ago, and is regarded as the common ancestor for all members of Proboscidea so far discovered. As with many of the others it was a swamp creature than subsisted on vegetation. It looked like a tapir, and was less than a metre high. It already had slightly protruding incisors on both the upper and lower jaws, the forerunners of tusks.
9. Stegodon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68521/685219344a49ea1b305a6bbb692ed71e893982b4" alt=""
10. Anancus
While googling around for images for this post, I discovered a creationist website claiming to "disprove" evolution using elephants as an example. The counterproof was photographic evidence of the stegodont-like elephants in Nepal (and a page that claimed that mammoths were not extinct, but showed a rather rheumatic Asian elephant). How sad - there are so many pieces of evidence to support the existence of evolution, but some people still insist in sticking their heads into the ground and denying reality. Why? Aren't these creatures amazing enough to admire without bringing ideology (I won't dignify such claptrap with the word "religion") into it?
I don't like to end on that sour note, so I'll add one more fantastic proboscid:
11. Deinotherium
6 comments:
WHERE DO YOU FIND ALL THE TIME TO DO THIS BLOG???
fuckkkk u
You should take some time to read the evidences of creationism. Answers in Genesis has a number of resources and a mound of evidence against evolution. Elephants are not the only evidence for creationism, and the "evidences of evolution" are refuted as well.
Shut up about genesis. I'm christian and i still believe in evolution. How would you like it if people were up in your face preaching to you about how genesis isnt real and evolution is what you should believe in? so shut the f#@k up!
I think it's funny that you don't realize that you have an idiology and, yes, a religion.
Emmy- regardless what folks believe, there is only one truth. From the evidence I've witnessed, macro evolution was a wild attempt to disprove God and has many leaks. The reason I came on here is because I have heard of great great great grandparents of ak natives here in Alaska that claim to have hunted a rare 4 tusked mammoth; and these same people hunted the more common mammoths just a couple hundred years ago. Interesting post though I would say the author was a little off topic in the end since evolution between species is a farce. One thing to remember: along the colville river, mammoth bones are a few feet below the surface and unfossilized dinosaur bones have been found just below them.
Post a Comment